A Couple Of Films And A Little Philosophy, That’s My Philosophy.
Nathan Croucher
Through a critical analysis of one film from the lecture programme, plus another film of your own choice, discuss ways in which film can explore and illuminate philosophical issues.
Introduction
In the following paper I will demonstrate how two films, one of which was screened and discussed as part of the Thinking Through Film module portray certain philosophical issues. The early section will concentrate on American director Terence Malick and much of the secondary research I have done on him, This includes his links and influence from certain philosophers and I will also use his 1998 feature The Thin Red Line as my film of choice.
The second part of the paper will concentrate on how philosophy is portrayed in Mike Leigh’s Naked(1993)
The links between philosophy and film may at times seem vague and some people often comment on how philosophy can portray philosophical issues but not actually contribute to philosophy itself. Whatever side of the argument you stand on there is no doubt that many directors have clearly raised philosophical issues and there is nobody better to look at than Terrence Malick. Famously patient when it comes to developing his feature films, even to the point that there was a twenty year gap between Days of Heaven and The Thin Red Line, his beautifully shot films have often raised questions to the audience in ways other directors may have previously not, this is perhaps partly why he is so revered.
In Terence Malick: Film and Philosophy by Tucker and Kendall they discuss what gives a film character on page 14, this is done using Malicks New World (2005) as an example, showing how the actual environment or nature affects plot and the protagonists, it’s as if nature is a character, this is common throughout various Malick films but I will be concentrating mostly on just Thin Red Line
The same chapter also references Edmund Husserl who was an early 20th century philosopher. According to The Essential Husserl: Basic Writings In Transcendental Phenomenology compiled by Donn Welton,Husserl in many ways remained a fellow traveller of seminal thinkers along the winding course of philosophy(Essential Husserl Chapter 2) Some of his elaborations which involve the assumptions of existence fit in very well with Malicks filmic style and the themes illuminated. . One of these philosophical ideas is one called phenomenology, this generally concerns conscious experience, with The Thin Red Line Malick could be playing with this idea.
Heidegger can also be linked to Malick, even as far as Malick even meeting the 20th century German philosopher. Heidegger was initially world changing but the Nazi party ended up taking up some of his ideas which in effect but people off him. Malick’s films especially the Thin Red Line are instances of what may be called Heideggarian cinema. Malick’s approach to filmmaking is strongly influenced by him.
The fact that Malick is so silent about his films leave them open to debate and argument which is itself an philosophical function(Poetic Visions of America, Patterson, H)
Cavell argues that Malick has ‘found a way to transpose such thoughts for out mediation. In films such as Badlands, Days of Heaven and Tree of Life he shows how the beauty of earth as if it was a character rather than something that just passes us by, this is also the case with The Thin Red Line. The film presents itself being as inter-connected of the world.
“He has discovered how to acknowledge a fundamental fact of film’s photogenic basic, that objects participate in the photogenic presence of themselves, they participate in the recreation of themselves on film.(Cavell)
The Thin Red Line references the question of being, “Being, which is that brings forth all beings, is itself not a being Different kinds of being have been distinguished from subsistence and other notions”(Lacey, A.R). The film focuses on the actions and morality of individuals, mostly through voiceover. It shows how individuals act in an effectively meaningless war, for example bravery, madness, numbness. This fits in with Heidegger’s philosophical questioning on Dasein and Being, Philosophy had only asked about beings. Since Ancient Greece, philosophy is the history of the forgetting on Being, in capitals. Heidegger believed that philosophy for the past two thousand years had neglected ‘being’ because it deemed obvious, rather than worthy of question. It was Husserl that stated that ‘all that philosophy could and should be is a description of experience “Experience itself is not science”(Husserl,1917 Lecture ), Heidegger appears to be the polar opposite of Husserl.
Dasien is a German word which Heidegger made famous in his book Being and Time. It actually means existence but he claimed it shouldn’t mean a subject. For example it means a person exists, but not the fact they exist. This relationally is not itself a being that can be grasped or isolated but cinema has the potential to at least help us glimpse at it.
Malick presents very deliberate neutrality toward both the concrete events and situations in the narrative as well as philosophical question, primarily through the character Sgt Wit, the only one who accepts everything around him.
We don’t actually see any humanity from the Japanese until after the first battle. Through this we can see that War is an intrusion on an otherwise natural paradise.
It is quite interesting how Sean Penn’s character believes that this world is the only one.
The Native Micronesians portray an image of freedom, going back to Plato’s Cave, this is indeed a contradiction that knowledge gives them power, in some senses knowledge can tie somebody down like a chain.
Mike Leigh’s Naked.
In the second part of this essay I am going to as stated, discuss Naked(1993) a British feature directed by Mike Leigh.
It follows a character called Johnny played by David Thewliss. He is an outspoken Mancunian who is London as he has raped a woman in his home city and must escape. He decides to see an old girlfriend Louise and he encounters various other alienated and displaced characters whilst in the capital. He often quotes various philosophical texts, quotes and ideas to everybody he meets He’s frustrated because he’s not understood. he’s an intellectual and mostly whenever he speaks everyone else does not quite understand, he can also often be seen reading, in fact in one scene his bag goes missing with his only possesions being his books of philosophy.
He is a flawed character has who redeeming qualities which make the audience engage with him. His story is intertwined with that of another character called Jeremy (Greg Cutwell) a posh, upper class yuppie who happens to behave pretty much like Johnny, but the audience find it hard to sympathise with him, this is a common theme in many of Mike Leigh’s films.
It deals with themes of Alienation. Alienation in philosophy has been explored by Heidegger , Sartre ,Fromm and countless other philosophers.
Karl Marx used the term ‘alienation to describe the depersonalised and purposeless of people who have become estranged from vital social and economic elements in their lives”, in the study of relating alienation to Naked it could also concern the human condition of estrangement from reality, for him a spiritual and rationally coherent whole(Collinson, Fifty Major Philosophers: A Reference Guide)
“Man is condemned to be free; because once thrown into the world, he is responsible for everything he does”(Satre,Being and Nothingness Conclusion, II)
Johnny has no connection with a woman named Sophie who is seemingly obsessed with him yet he has sex with her several times, “One classic sign for alienation is mistaking sex for love” This fits in well with Johnny’s behaviour, he is alienated to the point that the consequences of his actions do not matter. She lacks self esteem to the point where even a bullying, arrogant Johnny can have sex with here. She is the first person he has a full conversation with in the film and we can from what he says that it is quite bleak, “Have you ever thought that you may have already lived the happiest day of your whole life, and all you have left to look forward to is fuckin’ sickness and purgatory?”
There is a pair of young Scottish homeless people in the film, they are alienated from the public, they are apart at one point and need to find each other, and Johnny helps then but as soon as they are back together they go off and ignore Johnny, he is himself alienated.
“Naked is an attempt to investigate the possibility of expressing freedom in an alienating society that promotes attitudes of bad faith.(Boulé & McCaffre, 2011).
There is a security guard with a belief that the rapture is near, Johnny meets his and they have a conversation. The building he works in is described as a post-modern gas chamber, guarding empty space could be used for the homeless but it isn’t.
They have a discussion about religion, the security guard thinks that bar-codes will become used for people, he is looking for meaning in absurd places. He is also alienated. He looks out of a high rise window and often spies on a woman, this is voyeurism. He has a fantasy life which involves his so-called past life, he want to visit and 17th century cottage in Eire which he believes was where his former physical being used to live.
One of the Reponses to a meaningless and empty universe is to create meaning, for comfort. Some of the things we consume as humans is escapism, intoxication is escapism, even music is an escape.
An person leading an authentic existence would perhaps take responsibility for their own actions. Johnny has the freedom of an authentic existence but is tied down to an inauthentic one.
Leap of faith, no safety net, does not makes a decision right or wrong, it is about making choices that do not matter, and this is often common with adults.
Reckless abandon is having no concept of consequences, Jeremy has such a pessimistic view of the world he feels he can do as he pleases.
Jeremy says he will commit suicide on his 40th birthday, he tells this to a woman he rapes at his apartment. That he wants to die young gives the impression that he thinks life is short and therefore there are no consequences.
As Albert Camus put it bluntly “There is one but one truly serious philosophical problem and that is suicide(Camus, A (2005). The Myth of Sisyphus(Paperback). London: Penguin)
The myth of Sisyphus is a famous painting and also a philosophical anecdote. Jean-Paul Sartre’s study of Albert Camus’s ‘novel’ on which he relies heavily on the philosophical work The Myth of Sisyphus, informs us that philosophy has interpretative and instructive purpose in relation to fiction and art’(Boule, McCaffe, 2011)
The gods as a punishment had condemned Sisyphus to rolling a rock to a top of a mountain for all eternity, making his life effectively meaningless. “The struggle itself towards the heights is enough to fill a man’s heart, one must imagine Sisyphus happy”(Camus,2005).
This is perhaps why Jeremy has yet to commit suicide, finding happiness in the futilty of life, this is why as humans most of the time we choose not to commit suicide. There is joyful affirmation in the absurdity of it all. Naked is a film full of circles, Johnny starts off running away and the film closes with him running away, nothing has been resolved, presumably Johnny will meet more people for the rest of his life and nothing will become of it. Johnny’s Dad was violent, this shows a cycle of violence.
“The surrender of man thinking to rationalism and of his artifice to technics have consequences which console man with the feeling that he is progressing but make him neglect or deny fundamental forces of his inner life which are turned in forces of destruction”(Existentialism and Humanism, Sartre)
Conclusion
After initially watching these films, it is clear that there is a broader experience to be gained by studying certain philosophers and their ideas, especially when they relate directly to film. By illuminating and portraying philosophy in their features Malick and Leigh have introduced many people to an area they may not have previously thought about with philosophy being an extension for a film and vice versa. On the surface Naked is at risk of seeming nihilistic and depraved, and The Thin Red Line could just be another war movie but by adding philosophical ideas it gives the films another dimension. The debate may always rage on as to whether film is only illustrating philosophy it is clear that both film and philosophy have worked together side by side and opened each other up to new audiences with their thought provoking philosophical films.
Books
Heidegger (2010). Being & Truth. London: Indiana University . 5.
Tucker & Kendall. (2011). Malick and Film Phenomenology. In: Terrence Malick: Film and Philosophy. New York: Continuum International. 14-.
Patterson, H. (2007). Chapter Fourteen: Terence Malick’s Heideggerian Cinema:War and the Question of Being in The Thin Red Line. In: Patterson, H The Cinema of Terence Malick:Poetic Visions Of America. 2nd ed. USA: Columbia University Press; 2nd edition . 179-189.
David Davies (2009). The Thin Red Line:Philosophers On Film. New York: Taylor & Francis Group. 77.
Welton, A Husserl, E. (1999). Introduction. In: Welton, D The Esn sential Husserl:Basic Writings In Transcendental Phenomenology. USA: Indiana
Husserl, E Moran,D. (1999). Introduction. In: Moran, D Logical Investigations Volume 1-Reprint. USA: Routledge. 1.
Satre, JP. (2007). 1. In: Existentialism & Humanism. London: Taylor & Francis.. 11.
LACEY, A.R (1976). A Dictionary Of Philosophy . 2nd ed. London: Routledge &
Keegan. 19.
Jean-Pierre Boulé, Enda McCaffre. (2011). Chapter Three, Naked, Bad Faith and Masculinity. In: Boule & McCaffre Existentialism and Contemporary Cinema: A Sartrean Perspective. UK: Berghahn Books.
Satre, JP (2003). Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. Conclusion II.
Collinson, D (1987). Fifty Major Philosophers:A Reference Guide. London & New York: Routeledge. Glossary -164.
Camus, A (2005). The Myth of Sisyphus(Paperback). London: Penguin
Web
Sinnerbink.R. (2006). A Heideggarian Cinema?:. Available: http://www.film-philosophy.com/2006v10n3/sinnerbrink.pdf. Last
Scott Tobias. (2009). The New Cult Canon: Naked. Available: http://www.avclub.com/articles/the-new-cult-canon-naked,31328/. Last accessed 10/12/2011.
Sandmeyer,B, Husserl,E. (2007). Chronology of Writings. Available: http://www.husserlpage.com/hus_cbib.html. Last accessed 9th